Paper detail

On an analogue of the Markov equation for exceptional collections of length 4

We classify the solutions to a system of equations, introduced by Bondal, which encode numerical constraints on full exceptional collections of length 4 on surfaces. The corresponding result for length 3 is well-known and states that there is essentially one solution, namely the one corresponding to the standard exceptional collection on the surface $\mathbb{P}^2$. This was essentially proven by Markov in 1879. It turns out that in the length 4 case, there is one special solution which corresponds to $\mathbb{P}^1\times\mathbb{P}^1$ whereas the other solutions are obtained from $\mathbb{P}^2$ by a procedure we call numerical blowup. Among these solutions, three are of geometric origin ($\mathbb{P}^2\cup \{\bullet\}$, $\mathbb{P}^1\times\mathbb{P}^1$ and the ordinary blowup of $\mathbb{P}^2$ at a point). The other solutions are parametrized by $\mathbb{N}$ and very likely do not correspond to commutative surfaces. However they can be realized as noncommutative surfaces, as was recently shown by Dennis Presotto and the first author.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.