Paper detail

On Aggregation Performance in Privacy Conscious Hierarchical Flexibility Coordination Schemes

In this paper we introduce a method for performance quantification of flexibility aggregation in flexibility coordination schemes (FCS), with a focus on privacy preserving hierarchical FCS. The quantification is based on two performance metrics: The aggregation error and the aggregation efficiency. We present the simulation framework and the modelling of one complex type of flexibility providing units (FPUs), namely energy storage systems (ESS). ESS cause intertemporal constraints for flexibility coordination that lead to aggregation errors in case flexibility is aggregated from heterogeneous groups of FPUs. We identify one parameter responsible for the aggregation error to be the power-to-energy ratio of the ESS. A grouping of FPUs using similarity in their power-to-energy ratios is shown to improve the coordination performance. Additionally, we describe the influence of flexibility demand timeseries on the aggregation error, concluding that future assessments of aggregation errors should consider multiple representative demand timeseries, which is a non-trivial task. Finally, we discuss the applicability of the developed method to scenarios of larger system size.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.