Paper detail

On additive shifts of multiplicative almost-subgroups in finite fields

We prove that for sets $A, B, C \subset \mathbb{F}_p$ with $|A|=|B|=|C| \leq \sqrt{p}$ and a fixed $0 \neq d \in \mathbb{F}_p$ holds $$ \max(|AB|, |(A+d)C|) \gg|A|^{1+1/26}. $$ In particular, $$ |A(A+1)| \gg |A|^{1 + 1/26} $$ and $$ \max(|AA|, |(A+1)(A+1)|) \gg |A|^{1 + 1/26}. $$ The first estimate improves the bound by Roche-Newton and Jones. In the general case of a field of order $q = p^m$ we obtain similar estimates with the exponent $1+1/559 + o(1)$ under the condition that $AB$ does not have large intersection with any subfield coset, answering a question of Shparlinski. Finally, we prove the estimate $$ \left| \sum_{x \in \mathbb{F}_q} ψ(x^n) \right| \ll q^{\frac{7 - 2δ_2}{8}}n^{\frac{2+2δ_2}{8}} $$ for Gauss sums over $\mathbb{F}_q$, where $ψ$ is a non-trivial additive character and $δ_2 = 1/56 + o(1)$. The estimate gives an improvement over the classical Weil bound when $q^{1/2} \ll n = o\left( q^{29/57 + o(1)} \right)$.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.