Paper detail

On a Theorem of Lovász that $\hom(\cdot, H)$ Determines the Isomorphism Type of $H$

Graph homomorphism has been an important research topic since its introduction [17]. Stated in the language of binary relational structures in that paper [17], Lovász proved a fundamental theorem that, for a graph $H$ given by its $0$-$1$ valued adjacency matrix, the graph homomorphism function $G \mapsto \hom(G, H)$ determines the isomorphism type of $H$. In the past 50 years various extensions have been proved by many researchers [18, 12, 1, 23, 21]. These extend the basic $0$-$1$ case to admit vertex and edge weights; but these extensions all have some restrictions such as all vertex weights must be positive. In this paper we prove a general form of this theorem where H can have arbitrary vertex and edge weights. A noteworthy aspect is that we prove this by a surprisingly simple and unified argument. This bypasses various technical obstacles and unifies and extends all previous known versions of this theorem on graphs. The constructive proof of our theorem can be used to make various complexity dichotomy theorems for graph homomorphism effective in the following sense: it provides an algorithm that for any $H$ either outputs a P-time algorithm solving $\hom(\cdot, H)$ or a P-time reduction from a canonical #P-hard problem to $\hom(\cdot, H)$.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.