Paper detail

On a recent preliminary study for the measurement of the Lense-Thirring effect with the Galileo satellites

It has been recently proposed to combine the node drifts of the future constellation of 27 Galileo spacecraft together with those of the existing LAGEOS-type satellites to improve the accuracy of the past and ongoing tests of the Lense-Thirring (LT) effect by removing the bias of a larger number of even zonal harmonics $J_{\ell}$ than either done or planned so far. Actually, it seems a difficult goal to be realistically achieved for a number of reasons. First, the LT range signature of a Galileo-type satellite is as little as $0.5$ mm over 3-days arcs, corresponding to a node rate of just $\dotΩ_{\rm LT}=2$ milliarcseconds per year (mas yr$^{-1}$). Some tesseral and sectorial ocean tides such as $K_1,K_2$ induce long-period harmonic node perturbations with frequencies which are integer multiples of the extremely slow Galileo's node rate $\dotΩ$ completing a full cycle in about 40 yr. Thus, over time spans $T$ of some years they would act as superimposed semi-secular aliasing trends. Since the coefficients of the $J_{\ell}$-free multisatellite linear combinations are determined only by the semimajor axis $a$, the eccentricity $e$ and the inclination $I$, which are nominally equal for all the Galileo satellites, it is not possible to include all of them. Even by using only one Galileo spacecraft together with the LAGEOS family would be unfeasible because the resulting Galileo coefficient would be $\gtrsim 1$, thus enhancing the aliasing impact of the uncancelled non-conservative and tidal perturbations.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.