Paper detail

On a question of Hof, Knill and Simon on palindromic substitutive systems

In a 1995 paper, Hof, Knill and Simon obtain a sufficient combinatorial criterion on the hull $Ω$ of the potential of a discrete Schrödinger operator which guarantees purely singular continuous spectrum on a generic subset of $Ω.$ In part, this condition requires the existence of infinitely many palindromic factors. In this same paper, they introduce the class P of morphisms $f:A^*\rightarrow B^*$ of the form $a\mapsto pq_a$ and ask whether every palindromic subshift generated by a primitive substitution arises from morphisms of class P or by morphisms of the form $a\mapsto q_ap$ where again $p$ and $q_a$ are palindromes. In this paper we give a partial affirmative answer to the question of Hof, Knill and Simon: we show that every rich primitive substitutive subshift is generated by at most two morphisms each of which is conjugate to a morphism of class P. More precisely, we show that every rich (or almost rich in the sense of finite defect) primitive morphic word $y\in B^ω$ is of the form $y=f(x)$ where $f:A^*\rightarrow B^*$ is conjugate to a morphism of class P, and where $x$ is a rich word fixed by a primitive substitution $g:A^*\rightarrow A^*$ of class P.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.