Paper detail

On a pair of zeta functions

Let $m$ be a positive integer, and define $$ζ_m(s)=\sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac{(-e^{2πi/m})^{ω(n)}}{n^s}\ \ \ \ \text{and} \ \ \ \ ζ^*_m(s)=\sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac{(-e^{2πi/m})^{Ω(n)}}{n^s},$$ for $\Re(s)>1$, where $ω(n)$ denotes the number of distinct prime factors of $n$, and $Ω(n)$ represents the total number of prime factors of $n$ (counted with multiplicity). In this paper we study these two zeta functions and related arithmetical functions. We show that $$\sum^\infty_{n=1\atop n\ \text{is squarefree}}\frac{(-e^{2πi/m})^{ω(n)}}n=0\quad\text{if}\ \ m>4,$$ which is similar to the known identity $\sum_{n=1}^\inftyμ(n)/n=0$ equivalent to the Prime Number Theorem. For $m>4$, we prove that $$ζ_m(1):=\sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac{(-e^{2πi/m})^{ω(n)}}n=0 \ \ \ \ \text{and}\ \ \ \ ζ^*_m(1):=\sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac{(-e^{2πi/m})^{Ω(n)}}n=0.$$ We also raise a hypothesis on the parities of $Ω(n)-n$ which implies the Riemann Hypothesis.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.