Paper detail

On a logarithmic sum related to a natural quadratic sieve

We study the sum $Σ_q(U)=\sum_{\substack{d,e\leq U\\(de,q)=1}}\frac{μ(d)μ(e)}{[d,e]}\log\left(\frac{U}{d}\right)\log\left(\frac{U}{e}\right)$, $U>1$, so that a continuous, monotonic and explicit version of Selberg's sieve can be stated. Thanks to Barban-Vehov (1968), Motohashi (1974) and Graham (1978), it has been long known, but never explicitly, that $Σ_1(U)$ is asymptotic to $\log(U)$. In this article, we discover not only that $Σ_q(U)\sim\frac{q}{φ(q)}\log(U)$ for all $q\in\mathbb{Z}_{>0}$, but also we find a closed-form expression for its secondary order term of $Σ_q(U)$, a constant $\mathfrak{s}_q$, which we are able to estimate explicitly when $q=v\in\{1,2\}$. We thus have $Σ_v(U)= \frac{v}{φ(v)}\log(U)-\mathfrak{s}_v+O_v^*\left(\frac{K_v}{\log(U)}\right)$, for some explicit constant $K_v > 0$, where $\mathfrak{s}_1=0.60731\ldots$ and $\mathfrak{s}_2=1.4728\ldots$. As an application, we show how our result gives an explicit version of the Brun-Titchmarsh theorem within a range.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.