Paper detail

On a Diophantine equation of Erdős and Graham

We study solvability of the Diophantine equation \begin{equation*} \frac{n}{2^{n}}=\sum_{i=1}^{k}\frac{a_{i}}{2^{a_{i}}}, \end{equation*} in integers $n, k, a_{1},\ldots, a_{k}$ satisfying the conditions $k\geq 2$ and $a_{i}<a_{i+1}$ for $i=1,\ldots,k-1$. The above Diophantine equation (of polynomial-exponential type) was mentioned in the monograph of Erdős and Graham, where several questions were stated. Some of these questions were already answered by Borwein and Loring. We extend their work and investigate other aspects of Erdős and Graham equation. First of all, we obtain the upper bound for the value $a_{k}$ given in terms of $k$ only. This mean, that with fixed $k$ our equation has only finitely many solutions in $n, a_{1},\ldots, a_{k}$. Moreover, we construct an infinite set $\cal{K}$, such that for each $k\in\cal{K}$, the considered equation has at least five solutions. As an application of our findings we enumerate all solutions of the equation for $k\leq 8$. Moreover, by applying greedy algorithm, we extend Borwein and Loring calculations and check that for each $n\leq 10^4$ there is a value of $k$ such that the considered equation has a solution in integers $n+1=a_{1}<a_{2}<\ldots <a_{k}$. Based on our numerical calculations we formulate some further questions and conjectures.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.