Paper detail

On a conjecture of Kaneko and Koike

In 2006, Kaneko and Koike defined extremal quasimodular forms and proved their existence in depth $1$ and $2$. After normalizing and restricting to the case of depth at most $4$, they conjectured a certain bound on the Fourier coefficients of such forms. More precisely, the prime factors of the denominators of the coefficients are requested to be smaller than the weight. Recently, Pellarin proved this conjecture in the case of depth $1$ and weight divisible by $6$. In this paper, we complete the picture in depth $1$. First, we show that his result implies the same result in the case of weight $6k+4$ for every integer $k \geq 0$ directly. Secondly, we adapt the strategy of his proof in the case of weight $w = 6k$ to the last case of weight $w = 6k+2$. Finally, we provide all computational details to both his and our intermediate results, since those details are essential to his proof, but were omitted during his exposition in arXiv:1910.11668. Parallel and independent from this work, Peter Grabner proved the aforementioned conjecture in full generality, see arXiv:2002.02736.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.