Paper detail

On a conjecture due to Griffiths and Harris

For a fixed $d \ge 5$, the Noether-Lefschetz locus parametrizes smooth degree $d$ surfaces in $\mathbb{P}^3$ with Picard number greater than $1$. This is a countable union of proper algebraic varieties. It is known (due to works of Voisin, Green and others) that the largest irreducible component is of codimension (in the space of all smooth surface in $\mathbb{P}^3$ of degree $d$) equal to $d-3$. The main object of study in this article is: For fixed $r$ greater than $2$ and less than $d$, the locus parametrizing degree $d$ surfaces in $\mathbb{P}^3$ with Picard number at least equal to $r$. It has been conjectured by Griffiths and Harris that the largest component of this locus is of codimension equal to $(r-1)(d-3)-\binom{r-3}{2}$. Furthermore, the irreducible component of this locus parametrizing surfaces with $r$ lines on the same plane is of this codimension. In this article we prove the statement for $d \gg r$.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.