Paper detail

On a conjectural symmetric version of Ehrhard's inequality

We formulate a plausible conjecture for the optimal Ehrhard-type inequality for convex symmetric sets with respect to the Gaussian measure. Namely, letting $J_{k-1}(s)=\int^s_0 t^{k-1} e^{-\frac{t^2}{2}}dt$ and $c_{k-1}=J_{k-1}(+\infty)$, we conjecture that the function $F:[0,1]\rightarrow\mathbb{R},$ given by $$F(a)= \sum_{k=1}^n 1_{a\in E_k}\cdot(β_k J_{k-1}^{-1}(c_{k-1} a)+α_k)$$ (with an appropriate choice of a decomposition $[0,1]=\cup_{i} E_i$ and coefficients $α_i, β_i$) satisfies, for all symmetric convex sets $K$ and $L,$ and any $λ\in[0,1]$, $$ F\left(γ(λK+(1-λ)L)\right)\geq λF\left(γ(K)\right)+(1-λ) F\left(γ(L)\right). $$ We explain that this conjecture is "the most optimistic possible", and is equivalent to the fact that for any symmetric convex set $K,$ its \emph{Gaussian concavity power} $p^s(K,γ)$ is greater than or equal to $p_s(RB^k_2\times \mathbb{R}^{n-k},γ),$ for some $k\in \{1,...,n\}$. We call the sets $RB^k_2\times \mathbb{R}^{n-k}$ round $k$-cylinders; they also appear as the conjectured Gaussian isoperimetric minimizers for symmetric sets, see Heilman \cite{Heilman}. In this manuscript, we make progress towards this question, and prove certain inequality for which the round k-cylinders are the only equality cases. As an auxiliary result on the way to the equality case characterization, we characterize the equality cases in the "convex set version" of the Brascamp-Lieb inequality, and moreover, obtain a quantitative stability version in the case of the standard Gaussian measure; this may be of independent interest.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.