Paper detail

On "Optimal" h-Independent Convergence of Parareal and MGRIT using Runge-Kutta Time Integration

Although convergence of the Parareal and multigrid-reduction-in-time (MGRIT) parallel-in-time algorithms is well studied, results on their optimality is limited. Appealling to recently derived tight bounds of two-level Parareal and MGRIT convergence, this paper proves (or disproves) $h_x$- and $h_t$-independent convergence of two-level Parareal and MGRIT, for linear problems of the form $\mathbf{u}'(t) + \mathcal{L}\mathbf{u}(t) = f(t)$, where $\mathcal{L}$ is symmetric positive definite and Runge-Kutta time integration is used. The theory presented in this paper also encompasses analysis of some modified Parareal algorithms, such as the $θ$-Parareal method, and shows that not all Runge-Kutta schemes are equal from the perspective of parallel-in-time. Some schemes, particularly L-stable methods, offer significantly better convergence than others as they are guaranteed to converge rapidly at both limits of small and large $h_tξ$, where $ξ$ denotes an eigenvalue of $\mathcal{L}$ and $h_t$ time-step size. On the other hand, some schemes do not obtain $h$-optimal convergence, and two-level convergence is restricted to certain regimes. In certain cases, an $\mathcal{O}(1)$ factor change in time step $h_t$ or coarsening factor $k$ can be the difference between convergence factors $ρ\approx0.02$ and divergence! The analysis is extended to skew symmetric operators as well, which cannot obtain $h$-independent convergence and, in fact, will generally not converge for a sufficiently large number of time steps. Numerical results confirm the analysis in practice and emphasize the importance of a priori analysis in choosing an effective coarse-grid scheme and coarsening factor. A Mathematica notebook to perform a priori two-grid analysis is available at https://github.com/XBraid/xbraid-convergence-est.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.