Paper detail

On $1/Z$ expansion, the critical charge for two-electron system and the Kato theorem

The $1/Z$-expansion for the ground state energy of the Coulomb system of an infinitely massive center of charge Z and two electrons (two electron ionic sequence) is studied. A critical analysis of the $1/Z$ coefficients presented in Baker et al, {\em Phys. Rev. \bf A41}, 1247 (1990) is performed and its numerical deficiency is indicated, leading, in particular, to unreliable decimal digits beyond digits 11-12 of the first coefficients. We made a consistency check of the $1/Z$-expansion with accurate energies for $Z = 1 - 10$: the weighted partial sums of the $1/Z$-expansion with Baker et al. coefficients, reproduce systematically the ground state energies of two-electron ions with $Z \geq 2$ up to 12 decimal digits and for $Z=1$ up to 10 decimal digits. This rules out the presence of non-analytic terms at $Z=\infty$ contributing into the first 10-12 decimal digits in the ground state energy; it agrees with the Kato theorem about convergence of the $1/Z$-expansion within that accuracy. The ground state energy of two-electron ions $Z=11\ (Na^{9+})$ and $Z=12\ (Mg^{10+})$ is calculated with 12 decimal digits.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.