Paper detail

OMI4papps: Optimisation, Modelling and Implementation for Highly Parallel Applications

This article reports on first results of the KONWIHR-II project OMI4papps at the Leibniz Supercomputing Centre (LRZ). The first part describes Apex-MAP, a tunable synthetic benchmark designed to simulate the performance of typical scientific applications. Apex-MAP mimics common memory access patterns and different computational intensity of scientific codes. An approach for modelling LRZ's application mix is given whichh makes use of performance counter measurements of real applications running on "HLRB II", an SGI Altix system based on 9728 Intel Montecito dual-cores. The second part will show how the Apex-MAP benchmark could be used to simulate the performance of two mathematical kernels frequently used in scientific applications: a dense matrix-matrix multiplication and a sparse matrix-vector multiplication. The performance of both kernels has been intensively studied on x86 cores and hardware accelerators. We will compare the predicted performance with measured data to validate our Apex-MAP approach.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.