Paper detail

Omega from the skewness of the cosmic velocity divergence

We propose a method for measuring the cosmological density parameter $Ω$ from the statistics of the divergence field, $θ\equiv H^{-1} ÷v$, the divergence of peculiar velocity, expressed in units of the Hubble constant, $H \equiv 100 h km/s/Mpc$. The velocity field is spatially smoothed over $\sim 10 h^{-1} Mpc$ to remove strongly nonlinear effects. Assuming weakly-nonlinear gravitational evolution from Gaussian initial fluctuations, and using second-order perturbative analysis, we show that $ <θ^3> \propto -Ω^{-0.6} <θ^2>^2$. The constant of proportionality depends on the smoothing window. For a top-hat of radius R and volume-weighted smoothing, this constant is $26/7-γ$, where $γ=-d\log <θ^2> / d\log R$. If the power spectrum is a power law, $P(k)\propto k^n$, then $γ=3+n$. A Gaussian window yields similar results. The resulting method for measuring $Ω$ is independent of any assumed biasing relation between galaxies and mass. The method has been successfully tested with numerical simulations. A preliminary application to real data, provided by the POTENT recovery procedure from observed velocities favors $Ω\sim 1$. However, because of an uncertain sampling error, this result should be treated as an assessment of the feasibility of our method rather than a definitive measurement of $Ω$.

preprint1994arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.