Paper detail

Omega_0 and Substructure in Galaxy Clusters

(Abridged) We examine the theoretical relationship between Omega_0 and substructure in galaxy clusters which are formed by the collapse of high density peaks in a gaussian random field. The radial mass distributions of the clusters are computed from the spherical accretion model using the adiabatic approximation following Ryden & Gunn. For a cluster of mass, M(r,t), we compute the quantity dM/M_bar at a cosmic time t and within a radius r, where dM is the accreted mass and M_bar is the average mass of the cluster during the previous relaxation time, which is computed individually for each cluster. For a real cluster in three dimensions we argue that dM/M_bar should be strongly correlated with the low order multipole ratios, Phi^{int}_l/Phi^{int}_0, of the potential due to matter interior to r. It is shown that the expected correlation between dM/M_bar and Phi^{int}_l/Phi^{int}_0 extends to the two-dimensional multipole ratios, Psi^{int}_m/Psi^{int}_0, which are well defined observables of the cluster density distribution. The strongest dependence of dM/M_bar on Omega_0 (lambda_0=0) occurs at z=0 where dM/M_bar propto Omega_0^{1/2} for relaxation times ~1-2 crossing times and only very weakly depends on mass and radius. The fractional accreted mass in CDM models with Omega_0+lambda_0=1 depends very weakly on Omega_0 and has a magnitude similar to the Omega_0=1 value. dM/M_bar evolves more rapidly with redshift in low-density universes and decreases significantly with radius for Omega_0=1 models for z > ~0.5. We discuss how to optimize constraints on Omega_0 and lambda_0 using cluster morphologies.

preprint1997arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.