Paper detail

Old and new results on density of stable mappings

Density of stable maps is the common thread of this paper. We review Whitney's contribution to singularities of differentiable mappings and Thom-Mather theories on $C^{\infty}$ and $C^{0}$-stability. Infinitesimal and algebraic methods are presented in order to prove Theorem A and Theorem B on density of proper stable and topologically stable mappings $f:N^{n}\to P^{p}.$ Theorem A states that the set of proper stable maps is dense in the set of all proper maps from $N$ to $P$, if and only if the pair $(n,p)$ is in \emph{nice dimensions,} while Theorem B shows that density of topologically stable maps holds for any pair $(n,p).$ A short review of results by du Plessis and Wall on the range in which proper smooth mappings are $C^{1}$- stable is given. A Thom-Mather map is a topologically stable map $f:N \to P$ whose associated $k$-jet map $j^{k}f:N \to P$ is transverse to the Thom-Mather stratification in $J^{k}(N,P).$ We give a detailed description of Thom-Mather maps for pairs $(n,p)$ in the boundary of the nice dimensions.The main open question on density of stable mappings is to determine the pairs $(n,p)$ for which Lipschitz stable mappings are dense. We discuss recent results by Nguyen, Ruas and Trivedi on this subject, formulating conjectures for the density of Lipschitz stable mappings in the boundary of the nice dimensions. At the final section, Damon's results relating $\mathcal{A}$-classification of map-germs and $\mathcal{K}_{V}$ classification of sections of the discriminant $V=Δ(F)$ of a stable unfolding of $f$ are reviewed and open problems are discussed.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.