Paper detail

Offset errors in probabilistic inversion of small-loop frequency-domain electromagnetic data: a synthetic study on their influence on magnetic susceptibility estimation

Small-loop frequency-domain electromagnetic (FDEM) devices measure a secondary magnetic field caused by the application of a stronger primary magnetic field. Both the in-phase and quadrature component of the secondary field commonly suffer from systematic measurement errors, which would result in a non-zero response in free space. The in-phase response is typically strongly correlated to subsurface magnetic susceptibility. Considering common applications on weakly to moderately susceptible grounds, the in-phase component of the secondary field is usually weaker than the quadrature component, making it relatively more prone to systematic errors. Incorporating coil-specific offset parameters in a probabilistic inversion framework, we show how systematic errors in FDEM measurements can be estimated jointly with electrical conductivity and magnetic susceptibility. Including FDEM measurements from more than one height, the offset estimate becomes closer to the true offset, allowing an improved inversion result for the subsurface magnetic susceptibility.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.