Paper detail

Odderon observation: explanations and answers to questions/objections regarding the PRL publication

The odderon observation recently published by the D0 and TOTEM collaborations has been widely accepted by a majority of the particle physics community and its importance recognized through dedicated physics seminars in the world major labs and physics institute. Naturally also some questions and objections have been raised, either privately or publicly, in discussion sessions and articles. In this proceedings article, a comprehensive list of these questions and objections are answered and supplementary material is provided. The methods and assumptions used in the extrapolation of the $pp$ elastic differential cross section to $\sqrt{s}$ = 1.96 TeV and its comparison to the D0 measurement in $p\bar{p}$ are shown to be valid and reasonable. Likewise, the methods and choices used for the $ρ$ measurement at LHC. Furthermore, objections against the odderon interpretation are demonstrated not to be valid. Finally, the combination of the different odderon significances, leading to the first experimental observation of odderon exchange, is shown to be well founded.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.