Paper detail

Odd order $C_4$-face-magic $m \times n$ projective grid graphs having $C_4$-face-magic value $2mn+1$ or $2mn+3$

For a graph $G = (V, E)$ embedded in the projective plane, let $\mathcal{F}(G)$ denote the set of faces of $G$. Then, $G$ is called a $C_n$-face-magic projective graph if there exists a bijection $f: V(G) \to \{1, 2, \dots, |V(G)|\}$ such that for any $F \in \mathcal{F}(G)$ with $F \cong C_n$, the sum of all the vertex labels around $C_n$ is a constant $S$. We consider the $m \times n$ grid graph, denoted by $\mathcal{P}_{m,n}$, embedded in the projective plane in the natural way. Let $m \geqslant 3$ and $n \geqslant 3$ be odd integers. It is known that the $C_4$-face-magic value of a $C_4$-face-magic labeling on $\mathcal{P}_{m,n}$ is either $2mn+1$, $2mn+2$, or $2mn+3$. The characterization of $C_4$-face-magic labelings on $\mathcal{P}_{m,n}$ having $C_4$-face-magic value $2mn+2$ is known. In this paper, we determine a category of $C_4$-face-magic labelings on $\mathcal{P}_{m,n}$ for which the $C_4$-face-magic value is either $2mn+1$ or $2mn+3$. It is conjectured that these are the only $C_4$-face-magic labeling on $\mathcal{P}_{m,n}$ having $C_4$-face-magic value $2mn+1$ or $2mn+3$.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.