Paper detail

Octant of $θ_{23}$, MH, $0νββ$ decay and vacuum alignment of $ A_{4} $ flavour symmetry in an inverse seesaw model

Measurements of disappearance channel of long baseline accelerator based experiments (like NO$ν$A) are inflicted with the problem of octant degeneracy. In these experiments, the mass hierarchy (MH) sensitivity depends upon the value of CP-violating phase $δ_{CP}$. Moreover, MH of light neutrino masses is still not fixed. Also, the flavour structure of fermions is yet not fully understood. We discuss all these issues, in a highly predictive, low-scale inverse seesaw (ISS) model within the framework of $A_4$ flavour symmetry. Recent global analysis has shown a preference for normal hierarchy and higher octant of $θ_{23}$, and hence we discuss our results with reference to these, and find that the vacuum alignment of $A_4$ triplet flavon (1,-1,-1) favours these results. Finally, we check if our very precise prediction on $m_{ee}$ and the lightest neutrino mass falls within the range of sensitivities of the neutrinoless double beta decay ($0νββ$) experiments. We note that when octant of $θ_{23}$ and MH is fixed by more precise measurements of future experiments, then through our results, it would be possible to precisely identify the favourable vacuum alignment corresponding to the $A_{4}$ triplet field as predicted in our model.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.