Paper detail

Obtaining the mean fields with known Reynolds stresses at steady state

With the rising of modern data science, data--driven turbulence modeling with the aid of machine learning algorithms is becoming a new promising field. Many approaches are able to achieve better Reynolds stress prediction, with much lower modeling error ($ε_M$), than traditional RANS models but they still suffer from numerical error and stability issues when the mean velocity fields are estimated using RANS equations with the predicted Reynolds stresses, illustrating that the error of solving the RANS equations ($ε_P$) is also very important. In the present work, the error $ε_P$ is studied separately by using the Reynolds stresses obtained from direct numerical simulation and we derive the sources of $ε_P$. For the implementations with known Reynolds stresses solely, we suggest to run an adjoint RANS simulation to make first guess on $ν_t^*$ and $S_{ij}^0$. With around 10 iterations, the error could be reduced by about one-order of magnitude in flow over periodic hills. The present work not only provides one robust approach to minimize $ε_P$, which may be very useful for the data-driven turbulence models, but also shows the importance of the nonlinear part of the Reynolds stresses in flow problems with flow separations.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.