Paper detail

Observing Open Clusters with a Sequence of Ages with Kepler

We propose to observe with Kepler an age sequence of nearby uncrowded open clusters. The current Kepler field contains very few (only 4) somewhat distant and/or old clusters. Nearby open clusters are already well characterized from ground- and many space-based observations. Our proposal focuses on mid and upper main-sequence variables (main sequence and pre-main sequence gamma Dor or delta Scuti stars, SPB/beta Cep stars, Cepheids, or yellow supergiants), having periods of hours to days accessible by longer cadence observations. Asteroseismology for these objects to date is limited by the number of modes observable from the ground, difficulty in obtaining spectroscopic or photometric mode ID for the fainter targets that have been observed by Kepler, uncertainties in interior and initial abundances, especially for stars with abundance anomalies, uncertainties in distance/luminosity, and lack of knowledge of prior evolution history. The additional constraints of common age, distance and initial abundances in clusters will place these variables in their evolutionary context, and help unlock some of the science and reduce uncertainties for understanding star formation and stellar evolution.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.