Paper detail

Observing Dark Stars with JWST

We study the capability of the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) to detect Supermassive Dark Stars (SMDS). If the first stars are powered by dark matter heating in triaxial dark matter haloes, they may grow to be very large and very bright, visible in deep imaging with JWST and even Hubble Space Telescope (HST). We use HST surveys to place bounds on the numbers of SMDSs that may be detected in future JWST imaging surveys. We showed that SMDS in the mass range $10^6-10^7 M_\odot$ are bright enough to be detected in all the wavelength bands of the NIRCam on JWST . If SMDSs exist at z ~10, 12, and 14, they will be detectable as J-band, H-band, or K-band dropouts, respectively. With a total survey area of 150 arcmin^2 (assuming a multi-year deep parallel survey with JWST), we find that typically the number of $10^6 M_\odot$ SMDSs found as H or K-band dropouts is ~10^5\fsmds, where the fraction of early DM haloes hosting DS is likely to be small, \fsmds<<1. If the SDMS survive down to z=10 where HST bounds apply, then the observable number of SMDSs as H or K-band dropouts with JWST is ~1-30. While individual SMDS are bright enough to be detected by JWST, standard PopIII stars are not, and would only be detected in first galaxies with total stellar masses of ~$10^6-10^8 M_\odot$. Differentiating first galaxies at z>10 from SMDSs would be possible with spectroscopy: the SMDS (which are too cool produce significant nebular emission) will have only absorption lines while the galaxies are likely to produce emission lines as well. Of particular interest would be the 1640 HeII emission line as well as Hα lines which would be signatures of early galaxies rather than SMDSs. The detection of SMDSs would not only provide alternative evidence for WIMPs but would also provide possible seeds for the formation of supermassive black holes that power QSOs at z~6.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.