Paper detail

Observer-based invariants for cosmological models

We consider the equivalence problem for cosmological models in four-dimensional gravity theories. A cosmological model is considered as a triple $(M, {\bf g},{\bf u})$ consisting of a spacetime $(M, {\bf g})$ and a preferred normalized time-like vector field ${\bf u}$ tangent to a congruence of fundamental observers. We introduce a modification of the Cartan-Karlhede algorithm by restricting to frames adapted to ${\bf u}$ and including the covariant derivatives of ${\bf u}$ along with the Riemann tensor and its covariant derivatives. To fix the frame we make use of quantities relative to the fundamental observers, such as the anisotropic pressure tensor, energy flux vector, electric and magnetic parts of the Weyl tensor and the kinematical quantities of ${\bf u}$. This provides a simpler way to construct a list of invariants relative to the fundamental observers that completely characterizes the model, independent of coordinates. As an illustration of the algorithm, we consider several well-known cosmological models from General Relativity.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.