Paper detail

Observed Cosmological Reexpansion in Minimal QFT with Bose and Fermi Fields

In this work we aim at explaining the re-acceleration of the expansion of the universe, or equivalently, the hierarchy problem, with the help of a simple field-theoretical model. In particular, we want to account for the notorious discrepancy between the observed value of the cosmological expansion term and theoretical values of the vacuum energy of free quantum fields. Rendered infinite by short-wavelength fluctuations, evaluation up to a cutoff in momentum space at the Planck scale leads to contributions of the order of $10^{76} \,\mathrm{GeV}^4$. The observed value of the cosmic expansion being of the order of $10^{-47} \mathrm{GeV}^4$, this is a difference of $123$ orders of magnitude. We propose a possible resolution of the hierarchy problem by a cancelation of divergences by equivalent contributions of bosonic and fermionic fields of the system, albeit after some fine-tuning of the parameters of the field theory. We show that in principle nothing beyond conventional ingredients of quantum field theory is necessary to provide us with a possible explanation of the observed dark energy, and thus with a solution to the hierarchy problem.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.