Paper detail

Observations of the Hubble Deep Field with the Infrared Space Observatory. II. Source detection and photometry

We present positions and fluxes of point sources found in the Infrared Space Observatory (ISO) images of the Hubble Deep Field (HDF) at 6.7 and 15 micron. We have constructed algorithmically selected ``complete'' flux-limited samples of 19 sources in the 15 micron image, and 7 sources in the 6.7 micron image. The typical flux limit at 15 micron is 0.2 mJy and at 6.7 micron is 0.04 mJy. We have selected ``supplementary'' samples of 3 sources at 15 micron and 20 sources at 6.7 micron by eye. We discuss the completeness and reliability of the connected pixel source detect ion algorithm used, by comparing the intrinsic and estimated properties of simulated data, and also by estimating the noise properties of the real data. The most pessimistic estimate of the number of spurious sources in the ``complete'' samples is 1 at 15 micron and 2 at 6.7 micron, and in the ``supplementary'' lists is 1 at 15 micron and 5 at 6.7 micron.

preprint1997arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.