Paper detail

Observations of the Abundances of Secondary Galactic Cosmic Rays from Z equals 5 to 28 Between 10 and 200 MeV/nuc Beyond the Heliopause by Voyager, Some Unexpected Anomalies and Their Interpretation Using a LBM for Galactic Propagation

Voyager observations for over 3 years beyond the heliopause have started to define features of the low energy, less than 100 MeV per nuc, cosmic ray secondary nuclei that have a zero or negligibly small source component. As an example, the abundance of B between about 7 and 15 MeV per nuc is unexpectedly large, greater than the prediction of a LBM by 2 or 3 in the measurement and cross section error. On the other hand, for several other heavier secondary nuclei with a low source abundance such as F and Z equal 17 to 19 and 21 to 23 nuclei, in the corresponding energy channels between about 10-20 MeV/nuc, zero nuclei have been observed. The same LBM calculations would predict about 6 to 7 events for the sum of these three groups of nuclei. The B observed intensities could be more closely matched by considering a nested LBM with 0.3-1.0 g/cm2 of matter near the cosmic ray sources, essentially a source component of B. This nested LBM calculation, if extended to the production of the above groups of secondaries, would however predict a total 8 to 12 events thus leading to an even larger discrepancy with the zero events that are observed. The measurements of heavier secondaries at low energies therefore make it very problematical that a nested LBM with more than a few 0.1 g/cm2 or more of matter near the sources could be the source of the large B abundance seen by Voyager. The large abundance of B at the lowest energies is best understood, so far, as the result of production mostly from a matter traversal of 10 g/cm2 in the galaxy, possibly in combination with uncertainties in the data and cross sections at these low energies.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.