Paper detail

Observations and models of slow solar wind with Mg9+ ions in quiescent streamers

Quiescent streamers are characterized by a peculiar UV signature as pointed out by the results from the observations of the Ultraviolet and Coronograph Spectrometer (UVCS) on board SOHO: the intensity of heavy ion emission lines (such as OVI) show dimmer core relative to the edges. Previous models show that the structure of the heavy ion streamer emission relates to the acceleration regions of the slow solar wind at streamer legs and to gravitational settling processes in the streamer core. Observations of Mg9+ ion EUV emission in coronal streamers at solar minimum were first reported by the UVCS instrument. The Mg X 625A emission is an order of magnitude smaller than the OVI 1032A emission, requiring longer exposures to obtain statistically significant results. Here, MgX coronal observations are analyzed and compared, for the first time, with the solar minimum streamer structure in hydrogen and OVI emissions. We employ the 2.5D three-fluid model, developed previously to study the properties of O5+ ions in streamers, and calculate for the first time the density, temperature, and outflow structure of Mg9+ ions in the solar minimum streamer. The Mg9+ ions are heated by an empirical radial heating function constrained by observations of the kinetic ion temperature obtained from MgX emission line profiles. The detailed structure of Mg9+ density, temperature, and outflow speed determined by the Coulomb momentum and energy exchange as well as electromagnetic interactions with electrons and protons in the three-fluid model of the streamer. The results of the model are in good qualitative agreement with observations, and provide insights on the possible link between the magnetic structure of the streamer, slow solar wind sources, and relative abundances of heavy ions.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.