Paper detail

Observational signatures of the black hole Mass Distribution in the Galactic Center

We simulate the star cluster, made of stars in the main sequence and different black hole (BH) remnants, around SgrA* at the center of the Milky Way galaxy. Tracking stellar evolution, we find the BH remnant masses and construct the BH mass function. We sample 4 BH species and consider the impact of the mass-function in the dynamical evolution of system. Starting from an initial 6 dimensional family of parameters and using an MCMC approach, we find the best fits to various parameters of model by directly comparing the results of the simulations after $t = 10.5$ Gyrs with current observations of the stellar surface density, stellar mass profile and the mass of SgrA*. Using these parameters, we study the dynamical evolution of system in detail. We also explore the mass-growth of SgrA* due to tidally disrupted stars and swallowed BHs. We show that the consumed mass is dominated for the BH component with larger initial normalization as given by the BH mass-function. Assuming that about 10% of the tidally disrupted stars contribute in the growth of SgrA* mass, stars make up the second dominant effect in enhancing the mass of SgrA*. We consider the detectability of the GW signal from inspiralling stellar mass BHs around SgrA* with LISA. Computing the fraction of the lifetime of every BH species in the LISA band, with signal to noise ratio $\gtrsim 8$, to their entire lifetime, and rescaling this number with the total number of BHs in the system, we find that the total expected rate of inspirals per Milky-Way sized galaxy per year is $10^{-5}$. Quite interestingly, the rate is dominated for the BH component with larger initial normalization as dictated by the BH mass-function. We interpret it as the second signature of the BH mass-function.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.