Paper detail

Observational Searches for Solar g-modes: Some Theoretical Considerations

We argue that the solar g-modes are unlikely to have caused the discrete peaks in the power spectrum of the solar wind flux observed by Thomson et al. (1995). The lower limit to the energy of individual g-modes, using the amplitudes given by Thomson et al., is estimated to be at least 10$^{36}$ erg for low order g-modes; the resulting surface velocity amplitude is at least 50 cm s$^{-1}$, larger than the observational upper limit (5 cm s$^{-1}$). We suggest that the most likely source for the excitation of solar g-modes is turbulent stresses in the convection zone. The surface velocity amplitude of low degree and low order g-modes resulting from this process is estimated to be of order 10$^{-2}$ cm s$^{-1}$. This amplitude is interestingly close to the detection threshold of the SOHO satellite. The long lifetime of g-modes ($\sim 10^6$ years for low order modes) should be helpful in detecting these small amplitude pulsations.

preprint1995arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.