Paper detail

Observational properties of low redshift pair instability supernovae

So called superluminous supernovae have been recently discovered in the local Universe. It appears possible that some of them originate from stellar explosions induced by the pair instability mechanism. Recent stellar evolution models also predict pair instability supernovae (PISNe) from very massive stars at fairly high metallicities (i.e. Z~0.004). We provide supernova (SN) models and synthetic light curves for two progenitor models, a 150 Msun red-supergiant and a 250 Msun yellow-supergiant at a metallicity of Z=0.001, for which the evolution from the main sequence to collapse, and the initiation of the PISN itself, has been previously computed in a realistic and self-consistent way. We are using the radiation hydrodynamics code STELLA to describe the SN evolution of both models over a time frame of about 500 days. We describe the shock-breakout phases of both SNe which are characterized by a higher luminosity, a longer duration and a lower effective temperature than those of ordinary SNeIIP. We derive the bolometric as well as the U, B, V, R and I light curves of our PISN models, which show a long-lasting plateau phase with maxima at Mbol=-19.3 mag and -21.3 mag for our lower and higher mass model, respectively. We also describe the photospheric composition and velocity as function of time. We conclude that the light curve of the explosion of our initially 150 Msun star resembles those of relatively bright SNeIIP, whereas its photospheric velocity at early times is smaller. Its 56Ni mass of 0.04 Msun also falls well into the range found in ordinary core collapse SNe. The light curve and photospheric velocity of our 250 Msun models has a striking resemblance with that of the superluminous SN2007bi, strengthening its interpretation as PISN. We conclude that PISNe may occur more frequently in the local universe than previously assumed.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.