Paper detail

Observational Limits on Patchy Reionization: Implications for B-modes

The recent detection of secondary CMB anisotropy by the South Pole Telescope places a conservative bound on temperature fluctuations from the optical depth-modulated Doppler effect of T_{3000} < sqrt{13} microK at multipoles l~3000. This bound is the first empirical constraint on reionization optical depth fluctuations at arcminute scales, tau_{3000} = 0.001 T_{3000}/microK, implying that these fluctuations are no more than a few percent of the mean. Optical depth modulation of the quadrupole source to polarization generates B-modes that are correspondingly bounded as B_{3000} = 0.003 T_{3000}. The maximal extrapolation to the l~100 gravitational wave regime yields B_{100} = 0.1 T_{3000} and remains in excess of gravitational lensing if the effective comoving size of the ionizing regions is R > 80 Mpc. If patchy reionization is responsible for much of the observed arcminute scale temperature fluctuations, current bounds on B_{100} already require R < 200 Mpc and can be expected to improve rapidly. Frequency separation of thermal Sunyaev-Zel&#39;dovich contributions to the measured secondary anisotropy would also substantially improve the limits on optical depth fluctuations and B-modes from reionization.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.