Paper detail

Observational evidence for two-component distributions describing solar magnetic bright points

Context. High-resolution observations of the solar photosphere reveal the presence of fine structures, in particular the so-called magnetic bright points (MBPs), which are small-scale features associated with strong magnetic field regions of the order of kilogauss (kG). It is especially relevant to study these magnetic elements, which are extensively detected at all moments of the solar cycle, in order to establish their contribution to the behaviour of the solar atmosphere, and ultimately a plausible role within the coronal heating problem. Aims. We aim to characterise the size and velocity distributions of MBPs in the solar photosphere in two different datasets of quiet Sun images acquired with the Solar Optical Telescope SOT/Hinode and the High-resolution Fast Imager HiFI/GREGOR, in the G-band (4308 angstroms). Methods. In order to detect the MBPs, an automatic segmentation and identification algorithm was used. Next, the identified features were tracked to measure their proper motions. Finally, a statistical analysis of hundreds of MBPs was carried out, generating histograms for areas, diameters, and horizontal velocities. Results. This work establishes that areas and diameters of MBPs display log-normal distributions that are well fitted by two different components, whereas the velocity vector components follow Gaussians, and the vector magnitude follows a Rayleigh distribution again revealing a two-component composition for all vector elements. Conclusions. The results can be interpreted as due to the presence of two different populations of MBPs in the solar photosphere, one likely related to stronger network magnetic flux elements and the other one to weaker intranetwork flux elemens. In particular, this work concludes on the effect of the different spatial resolutions of the GREGOR and Hinode telescopes, affecting detections and average values.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.