Paper detail

Observational Evidence for Intermediate-Mass Black Holes in Ultra-luminous X-ray Sources

Evidence is mounting that some Ultra-luminous X-ray sources (ULXs) may contain accreting intermediate-mass black holes (IMBHs). We review the current observational evidence for IMBH-ULXs. While low-luminosity ULXs with L_X <~ 10^39.5 erg/s (assuming isotropic emission) are consistent with mildly X-ray beamed high-mass X-ray binaries, there are a considerable number of ULXs with larger X-ray luminosities that are not easily explained by these models. Recent high-S/N XMM X-ray spectra are showing an increasing number of ULXs with ``cool disks'' -- accretion disks with multi-color blackbody inner disk temperatures kT_in ~ 0.1-0.2 keV, consistent with accreting IMBHs. Optical emission-line studies of ULX nebulae provide useful measurements of X-ray energetics, and can thus determine if the X-rays are emitted isotropically. Analysis of an optical spectrum of the Ho II ULX nebulae implies an X-ray energy source with ~10^40 erg/s is present, suggesting an isotropically-emitting IMBH. The spatial coincidence of ULXs with dense star clusters (young clusters and globular clusters) suggests that IMBHs formed in these clusters could be the compact objects in the associated ULXs. Quasi-periodic oscillations and frequency breaks in XMM power-density spectra of ULXs also suggest that the black hole masses are more consistent with IMBHs than stellar-mass black holes. Since _all_ of these ULXs with evidence for IMBHs are high-luminosity ULXs, i.e., L_X >~ 10^40 ergs, we suggest that this class of ULXs is generally powered by accreting IMBHs.

preprint2004arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.