Paper detail

Observational Constraints on the Multiphase Nature of Outflows Using Large Spectroscopic Surveys at $z\sim$0

Mass outflow rates and loading factors are typically used to infer the quenching potential of galactic-scale outflows. However, these generally rely on observations of a single gas phase which can severely underestimate the total ejected gas mass. To address this, we use observations of high mass ($\geqslant$10$^{10}$ M$_{\odot}$), normal star-forming galaxies at $z\sim$0 from the MaNGA, xCOLD GASS, xGASS and ALFALFA surveys and a stacking of NaD, H$α$, CO(1-0) and HI 21cm tracers with the aim of placing constraints on an average, total mass outflow rate and loading factor. We find detections of outflows in both neutral and ionised gas tracers, with no detections in stacks of molecular or atomic gas emission. Modelling of the outflow components reveals velocities of $|$v$_{\text{NaD}}|$=131 km s$^{-1}$ and $|$v$_{\text{H}α}|$=439 km s$^{-1}$ and outflow rates of $\dot{M}_{\text{NaD}}$=7.55 M$_{\odot}$yr$^{-1}$ and $\dot{M}_{\text{H}α}$=0.10 M$_{\odot}$yr$^{-1}$ for neutral and ionised gas, respectively. Assuming a molecular/atomic outflow velocity of 200 km s$^{-1}$, we derive upper limits of $\dot{M}_{\text{CO}}<$19.43 M$_{\odot}$yr$^{-1}$ and $\dot{M}_{\text{HI}}<$26.72 M$_{\odot}$yr$^{-1}$ for the molecular and atomic gas, respectively. Combining the detections and upper limits, we find average total outflow rates of $\dot{M}_{\text{tot}}\lesssim$27 M$_{\odot}$yr$^{-1}$ and a loading factor of $η_{\text{tot}}\lesssim$6.39, with molecular gas likely contributing $\lesssim$72% of the total mass outflow rate, and neutral and ionised gas contributing $\sim$28% and $<$1%, respectively. Our results suggest that, to first order, a degree of quenching via ejective feedback could occur in normal galaxies when considering all gas phases, even in the absence of an AGN.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.