Paper detail

Observational constraints on the likelihood of $^{26}$Al in planet-forming environments

Recent work suggests that $^{26}$Al may determine the water budget in terrestrial exoplanets as its radioactive decay dehydrates planetesimals leading to rockier compositions. Here I consider the observed distribution of $^{26}$Al in the Galaxy and typical star-forming environments to estimate the likelihood of $^{26}$Al enrichment during planet formation. I do not assume Solar-System-specific constraints as I am interested in enrichment for exoplanets generally. Observations indicate that high-mass stars dominate the production of $^{26}$Al with nearly equal contributions from their winds and supernovae. $^{26}$Al abundances are comparable to those in the early Solar System in the high-mass star-forming regions where most stars (and thereby most planets) form. These high abundances appear to be maintained for a few Myr, much longer than the 0.7 Myr half-life. Observed bulk $^{26}$Al velocities are an order of magnitude slower than expected from winds and supernovae. These observations are at odds with typical model assumptions that $^{26}$Al is provided instantaneously by high velocity mass loss from supernovae and winds. Regular replenishment of $^{26}$Al especially when coupled with the small age differences that are common in high-mass star-forming complexes, may significantly increase the number of star/planet-forming systems exposed to $^{26}$Al. Exposure does not imply enrichment, but the order of magnitude slower velocity of $^{26}$Al may alter the fraction that is incorporated into planet-forming material. Together, this suggests that the conditions for rocky planet formation are not rare, nor are they ubiquitous, as small regions like Taurus that lack high-mass stars to produce $^{26}$Al may be less likely to form rocky planets. I conclude with suggested directions for future studies.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.