Paper detail

Observational constraints on the interacting Ricci dark energy model

We consider an extension of the holographic Ricci dark energy model by introducing an interaction between dark energy and matter. In this model, the dark energy density is given by $rho_{Lambda}=-frac{1}{2}alpha M_{p}^{2}{R}$, where ${R}$ is the Ricci scalar curvature, $M_{p}$ is the reduced Planck mass, and $alpha$ is a dimensionless parameter. The interaction rate is given by $Q=gamma H rho_{Lambda}$, where $H$ is the Hubble expansion rate, and $gamma$ is a dimensionless parameter. We investigate current observational constraints on this model by applying the type Ia supernovae, the baryon acoustic oscillation and the CMB anisotropy data. It is shown that a nonvanishing interaction rate is favored by the observations. The best fit values are $alpha=0.45 pm 0.03$ and $gamma=0.15 pm 0.03$ for the present dark energy density parameter $Omega_{Lambda 0}=0.73 pm0.03$.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.