Paper detail

Observational constraints on Modified Chaplygin Gas from Large Scale Structure

We study cosmological models with modified Chaplygin gas (in short, MCG) to determine observational constraints on its EoS parameters. The observational data of the background and the growth tests are employed. The background test data namely, H(z)-z data, CMB shift parameter, Baryonic acoustic oscillations (BAO) peak parameter, SN Ia data are considered to study the dynamical aspects of the universe. The growth test data we employ here consists of the linear growth function for the large scale structures of the universe, models are explored assuming MCG as a candidate for dark energy. Considering the observational growth data for a given range of redshift from the Wiggle-Z measurements and rms mass fluctuations from Ly-$α$ measurements, cosmological models are analyzed numerically to determine constraints on the MCG parameters. In this case, the Wang-Steinhardt ansatz for the growth index $γ$ and growth function $f$ (defined as $f=Ω_{m}^γ (a)$) are also taken into account for the numerical analysis. The best-fit values of the equation of state parameters obtained here are used to study the variation of the growth function ($f$), growth index ($γ$), equation of state parameter ($ω$), squared sound speed $c^2_{s}$ and deceleration parameter with redshift. The observational constraints on the MCG parameters obtained here are then compared with those of the GCG model for viable cosmology. It is noted that MCG models satisfactorily accommodate an accelerating phase followed by a matter dominated phase of the universe. The permitted range of values of the EoS parameters and the associated parameters ($f$, $γ$, $ω$, $Ω$, $c^2_{s}$, $q$) are compared with those obtained earlier using other observations.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.