Observational constraints on $f(T)$ theory

The $f(T)$ theory, which is an extension of teleparallel, or torsion scalar $T$, gravity, is recently proposed to explain the present cosmic accelerating expansion with no need of dark energy. In this Letter, we first perform the statefinder analysis and $Om(z)$ diagnostic to two concrete $f(T)$ models, i.e., $f(T)=α(-T)^n$ and $f(T)=-αT(1-e^{p {T_0}/T})$, and find that a crossing of phantom divide line is impossible for both models. This is contrary to an existing result where a crossing is claimed for the second model. We, then, study the constraints on them from the latest Union 2 Type Ia Supernova (Sne Ia) set, the baryonic acoustic oscillation (BAO), and the cosmic microwave background (CMB) radiation. Our results show that at the 95% confidence level $Ω_{m0}=0.272_{-0.032}^{+0.036}$, $n=0.04_{-0.33}^{+0.22}$ for Model 1 and $Ω_{m0}=0.272_{-0.034}^{+0.036}$, $p=-0.02_{-0.20}^{+0.31}$ for Model 2. A comparison of these two models with the $Λ$CDM by the $χ^2_{Min}/dof$ (dof: degree of freedom) criterion indicates that $Λ$CDM is still favored by observations. We also study the evolution of the equation of state for the effective dark energy in the theory and find that Sne Ia favors a phantom-like dark energy, while Sne Ia + BAO + CMB prefers a quintessence-like one.

No reviews yet.

No comments yet.