Paper detail

Observational Constraints From Binary Stars on Stellar Evolution Models

Accurate determinations of masses and radii in binary stars, along with estimates of the effective temperatures, metallicities, and other properties, have long been used to test models of stellar evolution. As might be expected, observational constraints are plentiful for main-sequence stars, although some problems with theory remain even in this regime. Models in other areas of the H-R diagram are considerably less well constrained, or not constrained at all. I summarize the status of the field, and provide examples of how accurate measurements can supply stringent tests of stellar theory, including aspects such as the treatment of convection. I call attention to the apparent failure of current models to match the properties of stars with masses of 1.1-1.7 MSun that are near the point of central hydrogen exhaustion, possibly connected with the simplified treatment of convective core overshooting.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.