Paper detail

Observational consequences of the Partially Screened Gap

Observations of the thermal X-ray emission from old radio pulsars implicate that the size of hot spots is much smaller then the size of the polar cap that follows from the purely dipolar geometry of pulsar magnetic field. Plausible explanation of this phenomena is an assumption that the magnetic field at the stellar surface differs essentially from the purely dipolar field. Using the conservation of the magnetic flux through the area bounded by open magnetic field lines we can estimate the surface magnetic field as of the order of $10^{14}$G. Based on observations that the hot spot temperature is about a few million Kelvins the Partially Screened Gap (PSG) model was proposed which assumes that the temperature of the actual polar cap equals to the so called critical temperature. We discuss correlation between the temperature and corresponding area of the thermal X-ray emission for a number of pulsars. We have found that depending on the conditions in a polar cap region the gap breakdown can be caused either by the Curvature Radiation (CR) or by the Inverse Compton Scattering (ICS). When the gap is dominated by ICS the density of secondary plasma with Lorentz factors $10^{2}-10^{3}$ is at least an order of magnitude higher then in a CR scenario. We believe that two different gap breakdown scenarios can explain the mode-changing phenomenon and in particular the pulse nulling. Measurements of the characteristic spacing between sub-pulses ($P_{2}$) and the period at which a pattern of pulses crosses the pulse window ($P_{3}$) allowed us to determine more strict conditions for avalanche pair production in the PSG.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.