Paper detail

Observational Consequences of Hydrodynamic Flows on Hot Jupiters

We use a grid-based shallow water model to simulate the atmospheric dynamics of the transiting hot Jupiter HD 209458b. Under the usual assumption that the planet is in synchronous rotation with zero obliquity, a steady state is reached with a well-localized cold spot centered 76 degrees east of the antistellar point. This represents a departure from predictions made by previous simulations in the literature that used the shallow water formalism; we find that the disagreement is explained by the factor of 30 shorter radiative timescale used in our model. We also examine the case that the planet is in Cassini state 2, in which the expected obliquity is ~90 degrees. Under these circumstances, a periodic equilibrium is reached, with the temperature slightly leading the solar forcing. Using these temperature distributions, we calculate disk-integrated bolometric infrared light curves from the planet. The light curves for the two models are surprisingly similar, despite large differences in temperature patterns in the two cases. In the zero-obliquity case, the intensity at the minimum is 66% of the maximum intensity, with the minimum occuring 72 degrees ahead of transit. In the high-obliquity case, the minimum occurs 54 degrees ahead of transit, with an intensity of 58% of the maximum.

preprint2007arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.