Paper detail

Observation of two distinct pairs fluctuation lifetimes and supercurrents in the pseudogap regime of cuprate junctions

Pairs fluctuation supercurrents and inverse lifetimes were measured on epitaxial c-axis junctions of the cuprates in the pseudogap regime, with a $PrBa_2Cu_3O_{7-δ}$ barrier sandwiched in between two $YBa_2Cu_3O_{7-δ}$ or doped $YBa_2Cu_3O_y$ electrodes, with or without magnetic fields parallel to the a-b planes. All junctions had a $\rm T_c(high)\approx 85-90$ K and a $\rm T_c(low)\approx 50-55$ K electrodes, allowing us to study pairs fluctuation supercurrents and inverse life times in between these two temperatures. In junctions with a pseudogap electrode under zero field, an excesss current due to pair fluctuations was observed which persisted at temperatures above $\rm T_c(low)$, in the pseudogap regime, and up to about $\rm T_c(high)$. No such excess current was observed in junctions without a pseudo-gap in the electrode. The measured conductance spectra at temperatures above $\rm T_c(low)$ were fitted using a modified fluctuations model by Scalapino [Phys. Rev. Lett. \textbf{24}, 1052(1970)] of a junction with a serial resistance. We found that in the pseudo-gap regime, the conductance vs voltage consists of a narrow peak sitting on top of a very broad peak. This yielded two distinct pairs fluctuation lifetimes in the pseudogap electrode which differ by an order of magnitude up to about $\rm T_c(high)$. Under in-plane fields, these two lifetime values remain separated in two distinct groups, which varied with increasing field moderately. We also found that detection of Amperian pairing [Phys. Rev. X \textbf{4}, 031017 (2014)] in our cuprate junctions is not feasible, due to Josephson vortices penetration into the superconducting electrodes which drove the necessary field above the depairing field.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.