Paper detail

Observation of the Production of a W Boson in Association with a Single Charm Quark

The first observation of the production of a $W$ boson with a single charm quark ($c$) jet in $p\bar{p}$ collisions at $\sqrt{s}=1.96 {\rm TeV}$ is reported. The analysis uses data corresponding to 4.3 fb$^{-1}$, recorded with the CDF II detector at the Fermilab Tevatron. Charm quark candidates are selected through the identification of an electron or muon from charm-hadron semileptonic decay within a hadronic jet, and a $Wc$ signal is observed with a significance of 5.7 standard deviations. The production cross section $σ_{Wc}(p_{Tc}>20 {\rm GeV}/c, |η_c|<1.5)\times B(W\rightarrow \ellν)$ is measured to be $13.6^{+3.4}_{-3.1} {\rm pb}$ and is in agreement with theoretical expectations. From this result the magnitude of the quark-mixing matrix element $V_{cs}$ is derived, $|V_{cs}|=1.08\pm0.16$ along with a lower limit of $|V_{cs}|>0.71$ at the 95% confidence level, assuming that the $Wc$ production through $c$ to $s$ quark coupling is dominant.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.