Abstract

SN2011fe was detected by the Palomar Transient Factory on August 24th 2011 in M101 a few hours after the explosion. From the early optical spectra it was immediately realized that it was a Type Ia supernova thus making this event the brightest one discovered in the last twenty years. The distance of the event offered the rare opportunity to perform a detailed observation with the instruments on board of INTEGRAL to detect the gamma-ray emission expected from the decay chains of 56^{56}Ni. The observations were performed in two runs, one before and around the optical maximum, aimed to detect the early emission from the decay of 56^{56}Ni and another after this maximum aimed to detect the emission of 56^{56}Co. The observations performed with the instruments on board of INTEGRAL (SPI, IBIS/ISGRI, JEMX and OMC) have been analyzed and compared with the existing models of gamma-ray emission from such kind of supernovae. In this paper, the analysis of the gamma-ray emission has been restricted to the first epoch. Both, SPI and IBIS/ISGRI, only provide upper-limits to the expected emission due to the decay of 56^{56}Ni. These upper-limits on the gamma-ray flux are of 7.1 ×\times 10−5^{-5} ph/s/cm2^2 for the 158 keV line and of 2.3 ×\times 10−4^{-4} ph/s/cm2^2 for the 812 keV line. These bounds allow to reject at the 2σ2σ level explosions involving a massive white dwarf, ∼1\sim 1 M⊙\odot in the sub--Chandrasekhar scenario and specifically all models that would have substantial amounts of radioactive 56^{56}Ni in the outer layers of the exploding star responsible of the SN2011fe event. The optical light curve obtained with the OMC camera also suggests that SN2011fe was the outcome of the explosion, possibly a delayed detonation although other models are possible, of a CO white dwarf that synthesized ∼0.55\sim 0.55 M⊙_\odot of 56^{56}Ni. For this specific model.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.