Paper detail

Observation of a potential future sensitivity limitation from ground motion at LIGO Hanford

A first detection of terrestrial gravity noise in gravitational-wave detectors is a formidable challenge. With the help of environmental sensors, it can in principle be achieved before the noise becomes dominant by estimating correlations between environmental sensors and the detector. The main complication is to disentangle different coupling mechanisms between the environment and the detector. In this paper, we analyze the relations between physical couplings and correlations that involve ground motion and LIGO strain data h(t) recorded during its second science run in 2016 and 2017. We find that all noise correlated with ground motion was more than an order of magnitude lower than dominant low-frequency instrument noise, and the dominant coupling over part of the spectrum between ground and h(t) was residual coupling through the seismic-isolation system. We also present the most accurate gravitational coupling model so far based on a detailed analysis of data from a seismic array. Despite our best efforts, we were not able to unambiguously identify gravitational coupling in the data, but our improved models confirm previous predictions that gravitational coupling might already dominate linear ground-to-h(t) coupling over parts of the low-frequency, gravitational-wave observation band.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access9 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.