Paper detail

Observation-dependent suppression and enhancement of two-photon coincidences by tailored losses

The uncanny ability of multiple particles to interfere with one another is one of the core principles of quantum mechanics, and serves as foundation for quantum information processing. In particular, the interplay of constructive and destructive interference with the characteristic exchange statistics of indistinguishable particles give rise to the Hong-Ou-Mandel (HOM) effect, where the bunching of bosons can lead to a perfect suppression of two-particle coincidences between the output ports of a balanced beam splitter. Conversely, in the case of two fermions, anti-bunching can systematically enhance these coincidences up to twice the baseline value of distinguishable particles. As such, the respective emergence of dips or peaks in the HOM experiment may at first glance appear to be indicative of the bosonic/fermionic nature of the incident particles. In this work, we demonstrate experimentally that the two-particle coincidence statistics of two bosons can instead be seamlessly tuned from the expected case of suppression to substantial enhancement by an appropriate choice of the observation basis. To this end, our photonic setting leverages birefringent polarization couplers to selectively introduce dissipation in the photons polarization degree of freedom. Notably, the mechanism underpinning this this highly unusual behaviour does not act on the individual phases accumulated by pairs of particles along specific paths, but instead allows them to jointly evade losses, while indistinguishable photons are prevented from being simultaneously detected in orthogonal modes. Our findings reveal a new approach to harnessing non-Hermitian settings for the manipulation of multi-particle quantum states and as functional elements in quantum simulation and information processing.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.