Paper detail

Observable invariant measures

For continuous maps on a compact manifold M, particularly for those that do not preserve the Lebesgue measure m, we define the observable invariant probability measures as a generalization of the physical measures. We prove that any continuous map has observable measures, and characterize those that are physical in terms of the observability. We prove that there exist physical measures whose basins cover Lebesgue a.e, if and only if the set of all observable measures is finite or infinite numerable. We define for any continuous map, its generalized attractors using the set of observable invariant measures where there is no physical measure, and prove that any continuous map defines a decomposition of the space in up to infinitely many generalized attractors whose basins cover Lebesgue a.e. We apply the results to the C1 expanding maps f in the circle, proving that the set of observable measures (even if f is not C1 plus Holder, is a subset of the equilibrium states.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.